Stigmatizing Street Children in Surabaya: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective

Authors

  • Syafa Nameyra Eka Nofitri Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Fariq Shiddiq Tasaufy Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v11i1.12930

Keywords:

stigma, street children, Systemic Functional Linguistics, transitivity, appraisal

Abstract

In Indonesian public discourse, street children are frequently associated with criminality, disruptive behavior, and social deviance. However, the linguistic mechanisms that produce and normalize this type of stigma are poorly understood. This study investigates how social actors in Surabaya depict street children linguistically in spoken interactions. Ten informants were drawn from three community groups: institutional stakeholders, community representatives, and civil society actors. They participated in semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative data. The data were then analyzed using an integrated framework of systemic functional linguistics and stigma theory. The findings show that street children are most frequently portrayed through relational processes (26.7%), encoding negative qualities as fixed inherent traits, followed by mental processes (23.3%) that frame them as cognitively and emotionally deficient. In terms of evaluation, judgment resources predominate (70%), with stigmatizing social scripts being reproduced by negative evaluations of normality and propriety. Stereotyping is the most prevalent of Link and Phelan's (2001) stigma components (46.7%), which is achieved by the co-occurrence of relational processes and monoglossic judgment. This study offers a novel contribution by combining transitivity, appraisal, and stigma theory in the analysis of grassroots spoken discourse on marginalized groups in Indonesia. The findings imply that stigma is maintained by normalized patterns of everyday language in addition to overt animosity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bednarek, M. (2018). Language and television series: A corpus-based approach to service- encounter interactions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559553

Bishop, R. E., & High, A. C. (2023). Stigma and supportive communication in the context of mental or emotional distress: An extension of the paradox of support seeking in close relationships. Communication Research, 50(6), 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231189811

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Evayani, W., & Rido, A. (2019). Representation of social actors in sexual violence issue in The New York Times and The Jakarta Post newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v17i2.322

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250

Fajriatin, A. (2024, November 8). Angka anak jalanan di Surabaya meningkat sejak 2022 [Radio Broadcast]. Suara Surabaya. Angka Anak Jalanan di Surabaya Meningkat Sejak 2022, Dinsos: Kolaborasi Seluruh Pihak Jadi Penanganan Terbaik - Suara Surabaya

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2022). Pemenuhan hak pendidikan anak jalanan di Kota Bengkulu. Direktorat Jenderal Perlindungan dan Jaminan Sosial, Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia. Pemenuhan Hak Pendidikan Anak Jalanan di Kota Bengkulu

Le, H., & Rew, L. (2025). Youth-centered recommendations to address social stigma and discrimination against unhoused youth: An integrative literature review. Journal of School Nursing, 41(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405231214061

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. SAGE Publications.

Maepa, M. P. (2021). Self-esteem and resilience differences among street children compared to non-street children in Limpopo Province of South Africa: A baseline study. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 542778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.542778

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Oktira, H. D., Sinar, T. S., Nurlela, N., & Rangkuti, R. (2025). The discursive construction of child [molestation]: A transitivity analysis. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(2), 762. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i2.13490

Risdianto, F., Sumarlam, S., Djatmika, D., & Wiratno, T. (2024). Appraisal and ideology realization in Indonesia state capital relocation news texts. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2022445.3381

Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229

Subu, M. A., Wati, D. F., Netrida, N., Priscilla, V., Dias, J. M., Abraham, M. S., Slewa-Younan, S., & Al-Yateem, N. (2021). Types of stigma experienced by patients with mental illness and mental health nurses in Indonesia: A qualitative content analysis. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 15(1), Article 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-021-00502-x

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Syahsurya, M. A., & Tasaufy, F. S. (2025). Systemic functional analysis of NATO's linguistic strategies to debunk Russian information warfare. Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal, 10(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v10i2.11335

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431474

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

Widiyana, E. (2024, November 10). 10 bulan, 167 anak jalanan dicakup Satpol PP Surabaya. detikJatim. https://www.detik.com/jatim/berita/d-7631719/10-bulan-167-anak-jalanan-dicakup-satpol-pp-surabaya

Wiratno, T. (2018). Pengantar linguistik sistemik fungsional. Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30