A Critical Discourse Analysis of Cultural Identity Representation, Algorithmic Culture, and Digital Commodification in Indonesian TikTok Content: A Fairclough Approach

Authors

  • Dewi Wulandari Universitas Deztron Indonesia
  • Jumino Suhadi Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Devi Pratiwy Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v11i1.12844

Keywords:

algorithmic culture, Critical Discourse Analysis, cultural identity, digital commodification, TikTok

Abstract

This study aims to examine how cultural identity is represented, negotiated, and commodified in Indonesian TikTok content within an algorithm-driven digital environment. TikTok has emerged as a dominant platform where cultural identity is constructed and circulated through short-form audiovisual content. While previous studies have explored cultural identity and digital discourse, limited research integrates these discussions with algorithmic culture and digital commodification, particularly in the Indonesian context. This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach using Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework. A total of 30 TikTok videos were selected through purposive sampling from an initial dataset of 120 videos. The data include verbal expressions, captions, hashtags, visual elements, and audience comments, which were analyzed across textual, discursive, and social dimensions. The findings reveal that cultural identity on TikTok is constructed through recurring linguistic and visual patterns, including identity markers, local language expressions, and cultural symbols. At the discursive level, creators adapt cultural content to platform conventions, audience engagement, and visibility strategies, resulting in hybrid forms of representation. At the social level, cultural identity functions both as a marker of belonging and as a commodified digital resource within the attention economy. The study further demonstrates that authenticity, hybridization, and commodification operate as interconnected processes rather than separate categories, forming a continuum of cultural representation in digital environments. This study contributes to digital discourse and cultural identity research by integrating CDA with platform dynamics and providing empirical evidence from Indonesian TikTok content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, C. & Lee, J. (2023). Introduction to TikTok Methodologies. Cultural Science, 15(1), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.2478/csj-2023-0003

Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours. Cultural Science, 12(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

Agyo, A. (2026). Censorship, Linguistic Innovation and Identity Construction in Selected Social Media Discourses: A Critical Discourse Analysis. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 16(1), 91-125. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v16i1.20086

Anderson, K.E. (2021). Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: talking about TikTok. Library Hi Tech News, 38(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7282/00000166

Angelina, R., Bu’ulolo, E. M., Putri, F. F., & Silalahi, R.(2026). Ideological Polarization in Online News Comment Sections: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Digital Language. Student Research Journal, 4(3), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.55606/srj-yappi.v4i3.2541

Bishop, S. (2020). Algorithmic experts: Selling algorithmic lore on YouTube. Social Media+ Society, 6(1), 2056305119897323. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897323

Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., ... & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International journal of information management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Grzenkowicz, M., & Wildfeuer, J. (2025). Addressing TikTok’s multimodal complexity: a multi-level annotation scheme for the audio-visual design of short video content. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 40(4), 1143-1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf047

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. SAGE.

Harrison, K.D. (2023). Environmental Linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9, 113–134.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

Jewitt, C. (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.

Kaye, D.B.V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021). The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120

Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2020). Multi-modal critical discourse analysis. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 60–76). Routledge.

Li, H., & Liang, Y. (2025). Study on identity construction of affinity group from the perspective of interaction ritual chains: A textual analysis of the “TikTok Refugee” discourse on REDNOTE. New Media & Society, 14614448251378986. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251378986

Lin, Y. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of news reports on TikTok. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(10), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.10.10

Machin D., & Mayr A. (2025). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. London: SAGE Publications.

Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J.D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. Frontiers in public health, 9, 641673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673

Rosalina, A., Suhadi, J. & Pratiwi, D. (2025). Discourse criticism in social media: a critical discourse analysis of youth identity representation on Instagram. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(6), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i6.1644

Rogers, R. (2011). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836149

Rusida, E. (2025). The representation of beauty language in TikTok’s K-beauty culture: a study of cultural pressure and identity formation. Jurnal Bahasa Asing, 18(2), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.58220/jba.v18i2.126

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036235192

Sarıyar, H. (2025). An Analysis of the TikTok Platform as a Digital Subculture. ISophos: International Journal of Information, Technology and Philosophy, 8(15), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.20897/isophos/18447

Setiadi, M. A., et al. (2026). The influence of TikTok on adolescent social identity. Journal of Psychology and Social Sciences, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.61994/jpss.v4i1.1412

Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392

Supriadi, I., N, E.H., P, P.H.I., & Sari, Y. (2024). Indonesian cultural identity in social media networks: A critical discourse analysis on Instagram of gen z users. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 2(1), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v2i1.76

Yang, H., & Fatimah, T. S. (2024). Social identity construction in digital communities: A case study on social media users in Indonesia. International journal of psychology and health science, 1(4), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.38035/ijphs.v1i4.730

Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New media & society, 24(8), 1872-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30