Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Peer Review

In the reviewing process, there are at least two reviewers for each manuscript in the related topic. The type of peer review method is double blind peer review. 

Articles submitted are reviewed by the editorial team as the initial process. The editorial team will evaluate the feasibility of the content, focus, and methodology of the article. The articles are then sent to two reviewers in the position of Double Blind Review. Notes from the reviewers were then sent back to the author to be adapted to the standards of journal writing. The decision of the revised manuscript will be re-evaluated in the meeting of the editorial board. Later, the decision of the editor in the final meeting will be informed to the author.

Editor of BAKT IKITA responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted must be published. Validation of these works and their importance for researchers and readers should always push the decision. The editor can be guided by a policy board of editors of the journal and is limited by law as to be enforced regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism (plagiarism). Editors can confer with other editors or the assessment team in making this decision