ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA PADA PERBANDINGAN TRIGONOMETRI BERDASARKAN TEORI NEWMAN
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the types of student errors in trigonometry material based on Newman's theory and the causes of these errors. This study uses a qualitative approach and descriptive research type. Research instruments in the form of tests, interviews, and documentation. In this study, 3 subjects with different abilities were taken, namely students with high abilities, students with moderate abilities and students with low abilities. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that: the most frequent types of errors made by the first students were comprehension errors or errors in understanding information. Second, process skill errors or calculation process skill errors. Third, the transformation error or error determines the formula where students are wrong in writing the formula to be used. Fourth, encoding errors. The causative factor is that students do not understand the concept of trigonometry material and do not master the concept so that students are unable to relate it to the previous material. Students do not know the problem-solving techniques, are not careful in working and are in a hurry or cannot take advantage of the time allotted.
Downloads
References
Astuti & Sari, N. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Struktur Aljabar di STKIP Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 73–80.
Baharuddin, N. A. H. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel Berdasarkan Newman Kelas X SMA Barrang Lompo. Skripsi. Tidak dipublikasikan. Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
Jingga, A. A., Mardiyana, & Setiawan, R. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Identitas Trigonometri pada Siswa Kelas X Semester 2 SMA Negeri 1 Kartasura Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika Solusi, 1(5), 48-62.
Kamarullah. (2017). Pendidikan Matematika Di Sekolah Kita. Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 21-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v1i1.1729
Kania, N & Arifin, Z. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 3(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v3i1.1471
Karnasih, I. (2015). Analisis Kesalahan Newman pada Soal Cerita Matematis. Jurnal PARADIKMA, 8(1), 37-51.
Listiana, A. D. & Sutriyono. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Materi Himpunan Bagi Siswa Kelas VII SMP. Pendekar: Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 1(1), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.31764/pendekar.v1i1.280
Novianti, V. & Riajanto, M. L. E. J. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMK dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Trigonometri. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(1), 161-168.
Nurafni, A., Pujiastuti, H., & Mutaqin, A. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Trigonometri Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 4(1), 71-80.
Qomari, N., Sesanti, N. R., & Marsitin, R. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Peserta Didik dalam Pembuktian Trigonometri dengan Tahapan Newman’s Error Analysis (Nea). Seminar Nasional FST 2019, 102-109. Malang: 10 Desember.
Raduan, I. H. (2010). Error analysis and the corresponding cognitive activities committed by year five primary students in solving mathematical word problems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3836-3838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.600
Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman Procedure for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks: A Malaysian Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(5), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036
Susilowati, P. J. & Ratu, N. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman dan Scaffolding pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial. MOSHARAFA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 13-24.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
