Adopsi Google Classroom Menggunakan Extended Technology Acceptance Model (EX-TAM)
Keywords:
Google Classroom, Blended Learning, Technology Acceptance Model, EX-TAM, Adoption Technology, LSR-SEM
Abstract
This study examines factors influencing the adoption of Google Classroom among students at private universities in East Java using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (EX-TAM). The model integrates core TAM constructs and external variables including Social Influence, Motivation, Perceived Enjoyment, and Self-Efficacy. Data from 146 respondents were analyzed using LSR-SEM. Findings indicate that Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness significantly influence Behavioral Intention, while Social Influence does not. Motivation and Self-Efficacy significantly affect Perceived Ease of Use, whereas Perceived Enjoyment does not. Perceived Ease of Use also significantly impacts Perceived Usefulness. These results highlight the importance of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and self efficacy in encouraging the adoption of digital learning platforms.
References
[1] W. Nugroho, A. Setiawan, and B. N. Romadhoni, “Optimalisasi Blended Learning Berbantuan Google Classroom untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 141–151, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.53621/jippmas.v1i2.64.
[2] L. A. D. Warman, “The Effect of Google Classroom in Blended Learning on University Students’ English Ability,” J-SHMIC Journal of English for Academic, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12–23, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.25299/jshmic.2021.vol8(1).6216.
[3] H. Wulandari et al., “Sosialisasi Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis IT untuk Menanggulangi Dampak Covid-19 dalam Bidang Pendidikan,” Mitra Mahajana Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–153, May 2021, doi: 10.37478/mahajana.v2i2.956.
[4] M. H. Wijaya and Y. Hafid, “PENERAPAN CHATBOT KUIS MESSENGER PADA GOOGLE CLASSROOM DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PEMROGRAMAN BERORIENTASI OBJEK,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Keguruan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 92–92, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.59562/progresif.v1i2.29549.
[5] P. F. Dewi and A. S. Abadi, “The Determinant Analysis of the Utilization of Google Classroom as the E-Learning Facility in Yogyakarta Nahdlatul Ulama University,” Telematika, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 12–12, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31315/telematika.v18i1.3968.
[6] M. Ilmi, F. S. Liyundira, A. Rachmawati, D. Juliasari, and P. Habsari, “Perkembangan Dan Penerapan Theory Of Acceptance Model (TAM) Di Indonesia,” RELASI JURNAL EKONOMI, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 436–458, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.31967/relasi.v16i2.371.
[7] V. Venkatesh, “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research, vol. 11, pp. 342–365, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
[8] M. A. Ayanwale, R. R. Molefi, and S. Liapeng, “Unlocking educational frontiers: Exploring higher educators’ adoption of google workspace technology tools for teaching and assessment in Lesotho dynamic landscape,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 9, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30049.
[9] M. Alotumi, “Factors influencing graduate students’ behavioral intention to use Google Classroom: Case study-mixed methods research,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 10035–10063, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11051-2.
[10] R. A. P. Dianfah, D. D. Anggoro, and A. F. Shofwah, “ANALISIS BEHAVIORAL INTENTION PADA PENERAPAN TAX MONITORING MENGGUNAKAN MODEL UTAUT2.” Feb. 2024.
[11] A. S. Rathnayake, T. D. H. N. Nguyen, and Y. Ahn, “Factors Influencing AI Chatbot Adoption in Government Administration: A Case Study of Sri Lanka’s Digital Government,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 157–157, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/admsci15050157.
[12] R. Alfaisal et al., “PREDICTING THE INTENTION TO USE GOOGLE GLASS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS: A HYBRID SEM-ML APPROACH,” vol. 21, no. 6, 2022.
[13] M. Al-Hamad, A. AlHamad, and K. Al-Qawasmi, “FACTORS AFFECTING THE ADOPTION OF GOOGLE TRANSLATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH AN EXTENDED TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM): JORDAN AS A CASE STUDY,” ICIC Express Letters, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1177–1186, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.24507/icicel.15.11.1177.
[14] M. R. Fearnley and J. T. Amora, “Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” IAFOR Journal of Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89–106, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.22492/ije.8.2.05.
[15] A. Qashou, “Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1755–1785, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10323-z.
[16] U. Alturki and A. Aldraiweesh, “Adoption of Google Meet by Postgraduate Students: The Role of Task Technology Fit and the TAM Model,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 23, Art. no. 23, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142315765.
[17] X. Chen and L. Zhou, “Research on the Behavior of College Students’ Online Tourism Booking Based on TAM,” Journal of Service Science and Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 28–44, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.4236/jssm.2020.131003.
[18] E. Cheung and J. Sachs, “Test of the Technology Acceptance Model for a Web-Based Information System in a Hong Kong Chinese Sample,” Psychological Reports, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 691–703, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.2466/pr0.99.3.691-703.
[19] D. Pibriana, “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk Menganalisis Penerimaan Pengguna Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Belanja Online XYZ,” JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 580–592, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v7i3.382.
[20] J. W. Fernanda and N. Hidayah, “ANALISIS PENERIMAAN APLIKASI PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE MENGGUNAKAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL 3 DAN PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (PLS-SEM),” Factor M, vol. 3, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.30762/factor-m.v3i2.3097.
[21] G. D. Israel, “Determining Sample Size,” EDIS, vol. 25, p. 2017, Nov. 1992, [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=K7X8WKEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=K7X8WKEAAAAJ:mvPsJ3kp5DgC
[22] N. Bouranta, L. Chitiris, and J. Paravantis, “The relationship between internal and external service quality,” Int J Contemp Hospitality Mngt, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 275–293, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1108/09596110910948297.
[23] A. P. Wetzel, “Factor Analysis Methods and Validity Evidence,” Academic Medicine, vol. 87, no. 8. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 1060–1069, Jun. 2012. doi: 10.1097/acm.0b013e31825d305d.
[24] D. Straub and D. Gefen, “Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research,” CAIS, vol. 13, 2004, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.01324.
[25] D. George and P. Mallery, IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step : A simple guide and reference, Fifteent Edition. Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.
[26] D. Harefa and M. L. Purba, “PENGARUH HARGA DAN LOKASI TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN KONSUMEN MENGINAP DI HO℡ REDDOORZ NEAR HERMES PLACE POLONIA MEDAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19,” JURNAL MUTIARA MANAJEMEN, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–26, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.51544/jmm.v5i1.3042.
[27] M. M. Abidin, E. Pramana, and J. P. Sugiono, “ADOPSI MOBILE PAYMENT DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN EXTENDED UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY,” Joutica, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.30736/informatika.v8i1.922.
[28] R. E. Kirk, “Effect magnitude: A different focus,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 1634–1646, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.09.011.
[29] American Psychological Association, Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceawyhyflfruf2mhsqqjthueohrsogt4nugylddl5yqvtm75oncowy?filename=American%20Psychological%20Association%20-%20Publication%20Manual%20of%20the%20American%20Psychological%20Association%2C%20Fifth%20Edition.pdf
[30] S. Pujilestari, M. Sayuti, and F. Tentama, “The Influence of Parental Guidance, Group of Peers, School Promotion, and Career Information on Course Preference Decision Class X SMK Muhammadiyah in Bantul,” Journal of Vocational Education Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–11, May 2021, doi: 10.12928/joves.v4i1.2073.
[31] S. A. Gumay and A. H. D. Seno, “Pengaruh Komunikasi Interpersonal dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Euro Management Indonesia,” JURNAL ADMINISTRASI BISNIS, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 68–68, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.14710/jab.v7i2.22691.
[2] L. A. D. Warman, “The Effect of Google Classroom in Blended Learning on University Students’ English Ability,” J-SHMIC Journal of English for Academic, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12–23, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.25299/jshmic.2021.vol8(1).6216.
[3] H. Wulandari et al., “Sosialisasi Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis IT untuk Menanggulangi Dampak Covid-19 dalam Bidang Pendidikan,” Mitra Mahajana Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–153, May 2021, doi: 10.37478/mahajana.v2i2.956.
[4] M. H. Wijaya and Y. Hafid, “PENERAPAN CHATBOT KUIS MESSENGER PADA GOOGLE CLASSROOM DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PEMROGRAMAN BERORIENTASI OBJEK,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Keguruan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 92–92, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.59562/progresif.v1i2.29549.
[5] P. F. Dewi and A. S. Abadi, “The Determinant Analysis of the Utilization of Google Classroom as the E-Learning Facility in Yogyakarta Nahdlatul Ulama University,” Telematika, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 12–12, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31315/telematika.v18i1.3968.
[6] M. Ilmi, F. S. Liyundira, A. Rachmawati, D. Juliasari, and P. Habsari, “Perkembangan Dan Penerapan Theory Of Acceptance Model (TAM) Di Indonesia,” RELASI JURNAL EKONOMI, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 436–458, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.31967/relasi.v16i2.371.
[7] V. Venkatesh, “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research, vol. 11, pp. 342–365, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
[8] M. A. Ayanwale, R. R. Molefi, and S. Liapeng, “Unlocking educational frontiers: Exploring higher educators’ adoption of google workspace technology tools for teaching and assessment in Lesotho dynamic landscape,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 9, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30049.
[9] M. Alotumi, “Factors influencing graduate students’ behavioral intention to use Google Classroom: Case study-mixed methods research,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 10035–10063, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11051-2.
[10] R. A. P. Dianfah, D. D. Anggoro, and A. F. Shofwah, “ANALISIS BEHAVIORAL INTENTION PADA PENERAPAN TAX MONITORING MENGGUNAKAN MODEL UTAUT2.” Feb. 2024.
[11] A. S. Rathnayake, T. D. H. N. Nguyen, and Y. Ahn, “Factors Influencing AI Chatbot Adoption in Government Administration: A Case Study of Sri Lanka’s Digital Government,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 157–157, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/admsci15050157.
[12] R. Alfaisal et al., “PREDICTING THE INTENTION TO USE GOOGLE GLASS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS: A HYBRID SEM-ML APPROACH,” vol. 21, no. 6, 2022.
[13] M. Al-Hamad, A. AlHamad, and K. Al-Qawasmi, “FACTORS AFFECTING THE ADOPTION OF GOOGLE TRANSLATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH AN EXTENDED TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM): JORDAN AS A CASE STUDY,” ICIC Express Letters, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1177–1186, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.24507/icicel.15.11.1177.
[14] M. R. Fearnley and J. T. Amora, “Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” IAFOR Journal of Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89–106, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.22492/ije.8.2.05.
[15] A. Qashou, “Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1755–1785, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10323-z.
[16] U. Alturki and A. Aldraiweesh, “Adoption of Google Meet by Postgraduate Students: The Role of Task Technology Fit and the TAM Model,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 23, Art. no. 23, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142315765.
[17] X. Chen and L. Zhou, “Research on the Behavior of College Students’ Online Tourism Booking Based on TAM,” Journal of Service Science and Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 28–44, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.4236/jssm.2020.131003.
[18] E. Cheung and J. Sachs, “Test of the Technology Acceptance Model for a Web-Based Information System in a Hong Kong Chinese Sample,” Psychological Reports, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 691–703, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.2466/pr0.99.3.691-703.
[19] D. Pibriana, “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk Menganalisis Penerimaan Pengguna Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Belanja Online XYZ,” JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 580–592, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v7i3.382.
[20] J. W. Fernanda and N. Hidayah, “ANALISIS PENERIMAAN APLIKASI PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE MENGGUNAKAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL 3 DAN PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (PLS-SEM),” Factor M, vol. 3, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.30762/factor-m.v3i2.3097.
[21] G. D. Israel, “Determining Sample Size,” EDIS, vol. 25, p. 2017, Nov. 1992, [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=K7X8WKEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=K7X8WKEAAAAJ:mvPsJ3kp5DgC
[22] N. Bouranta, L. Chitiris, and J. Paravantis, “The relationship between internal and external service quality,” Int J Contemp Hospitality Mngt, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 275–293, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1108/09596110910948297.
[23] A. P. Wetzel, “Factor Analysis Methods and Validity Evidence,” Academic Medicine, vol. 87, no. 8. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 1060–1069, Jun. 2012. doi: 10.1097/acm.0b013e31825d305d.
[24] D. Straub and D. Gefen, “Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research,” CAIS, vol. 13, 2004, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.01324.
[25] D. George and P. Mallery, IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step : A simple guide and reference, Fifteent Edition. Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.
[26] D. Harefa and M. L. Purba, “PENGARUH HARGA DAN LOKASI TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN KONSUMEN MENGINAP DI HO℡ REDDOORZ NEAR HERMES PLACE POLONIA MEDAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19,” JURNAL MUTIARA MANAJEMEN, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–26, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.51544/jmm.v5i1.3042.
[27] M. M. Abidin, E. Pramana, and J. P. Sugiono, “ADOPSI MOBILE PAYMENT DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN EXTENDED UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY,” Joutica, vol. 8, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.30736/informatika.v8i1.922.
[28] R. E. Kirk, “Effect magnitude: A different focus,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 1634–1646, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.09.011.
[29] American Psychological Association, Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzaceawyhyflfruf2mhsqqjthueohrsogt4nugylddl5yqvtm75oncowy?filename=American%20Psychological%20Association%20-%20Publication%20Manual%20of%20the%20American%20Psychological%20Association%2C%20Fifth%20Edition.pdf
[30] S. Pujilestari, M. Sayuti, and F. Tentama, “The Influence of Parental Guidance, Group of Peers, School Promotion, and Career Information on Course Preference Decision Class X SMK Muhammadiyah in Bantul,” Journal of Vocational Education Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–11, May 2021, doi: 10.12928/joves.v4i1.2073.
[31] S. A. Gumay and A. H. D. Seno, “Pengaruh Komunikasi Interpersonal dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Euro Management Indonesia,” JURNAL ADMINISTRASI BISNIS, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 68–68, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.14710/jab.v7i2.22691.
Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Abidin, M. (2025). Adopsi Google Classroom Menggunakan Extended Technology Acceptance Model (EX-TAM). UJMC (Unisda Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science), 11(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/ujmc.v11i1.10426
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in UJMC (Unisda Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science) agree to the following terms:
1.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
