THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PERKINS AND BLYTHE TEACHING MODEL IN ACQUIRING PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS AMONG ELEVENTH GRADE SECONDARY STUDENTS

  • Ismael Ibrahim Ahmed University of Duhok
Keywords: Teaching for Understanding Framework, Perkins and Blythe Model, Philosophical Concept Acquisition, Constructivist Pedagogy, Secondary Education

Abstract

This experimental study investigated the effectiveness of the Perkins and Blythe Teaching for Understanding framework in enhancing philosophical concept acquisition among eleventh-grade students in Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Seventy-two male students from Sêmêl Preparatory School participated in this quasi-experimental design with partial control during the 2024-2025 academic year. The experimental group (n=37) received instruction usFbating the Perkins and Blythe model, while the control group (n=35) followed conventional teaching methods. The study covered three chapters from the Grade 11 Philosophy textbook: Introduction to Philosophy, Logic and Critical Thinking, and Ethics and Moral Philosophy. A 30-item concept acquisition test measuring definition, discrimination, and application levels was administered as pre-test and post-test. Independent samples t-test revealed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) favoring the experimental group in post-test comparison (t=7.528). Paired samples t-test showed significant improvement within the experimental group between pre-test and post-test (t=19.842). The experimental group demonstrated superior performance across all three concept acquisition levels. These findings suggest that the Perkins and Blythe framework promotes deeper understanding of philosophical concepts compared to traditional methods, supporting its integration into philosophy curricula and warranting professional development programs for secondary teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ben Messi, Z., & Khazar, W. (2011). Difficulties of teaching philosophy for scientific streams and ways to overcome them. In Teaching Philosophy in Algeria: Reality and Prospects, Constantine Higher School of Teachers Conference Proceedings.
Blythe, T. (1998). The teaching for understanding guide. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Cassidy, C. (2021). Philosophy with children: A rights-based approach to deliberative participation. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 29(1), 1-22.
D'Olimpio, L., Pais, A., & Thompson, C. (2024). Philosophy, arts, and education: Cultivating aesthetic and ethical understanding. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 58(1), 127-145.
Dzaiy, A. H., & Abdullah, S. A. (2024). The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(1), 140-157.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
Howell, C. A. (2024). Conceptual understanding, engagement, and optimal learning moments with problem-oriented project learning in high school physics [Doctoral dissertation, Lindenwood University]. Digital Commons@Lindenwood University.
Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching for understanding: Spotlighting the Blythe and Associates pedagogical model. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 23-37.
Le, H. V., & Nguyen, L. Q. (2024). Promoting L2 learners' critical thinking skills: The role of social constructivism in reading class. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1241973.
Lin, C. H., Liu, Y. C., & Wang, M. T. (2023). Constructivist learning theory in the context of AI in education: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 845-862.
Liu, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of constructivist teaching effects in Chinese education. Educational Research Review, 35, Article 100431.
Nasir, M., Rijal, M. K., & Primarni, A. (2024). The role of constructivism in modern educational philosophy: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(6), 421-438.
Nguyen, T. H., Pham, V. L., & Tran, Q. K. (2023). How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach. Heliyon, 9(12), Article e22623.
Pala, F. (2022). The effect of philosophy education for children (P4C) on students' conceptual achievement and critical thinking skills: A mixed method research. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2), 112-128.
Shahini Kevesk, R., Azad, M. A., & Manshaee, G. R. (2025). The impact of philosophy for children program on working memory and frustration tolerance in sixth-grade students. International Journal of Education and Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 1-10.
Sulaiman, A. H., & Abdullah, S. A. (2024). Active learning strategies in higher education: A comprehensive review. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(1), 140-157.
Taber, K. S. (2024). Educational constructivism. Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, 4(4), 1847-1865.
Wiske, M. S. (1998). Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Young, J. R., Egan, T. E., & Wharton, M. D. (2024). Engaging classroom observation: A brief measure of active learning in the college classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(2), 215-230.
Published
2026-01-29
How to Cite
Ahmed, I. (2026). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PERKINS AND BLYTHE TEACHING MODEL IN ACQUIRING PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS AMONG ELEVENTH GRADE SECONDARY STUDENTS. TA’LIM : Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 119-145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/talim.v9i1.12283
Section
Articles