Akuntabilitas Perumusan Kebijakan Publik dalam Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (MUSRENBANG)
Studi pada Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Malang
Abstract
The implementation of the development planning meeting (MUSRENBANG) in each region including the Malang district is often not optimal in the process so that the development development that is expected by the community through musrenbang does not have a good impact and does not give satisfaction to the residents. In the process of the Musrenbang, of course, it cannot be separated from the supervision and escort of the poor district government apparatus to begin with fiscal, program, process, legal and outgoing accountability in its implementation. So that the expectations of researchers through this paper can provide a brief summary of the accountability of the Musrenbang implementation process so far. This type of research uses a qualitative descriptive type of research. The results of this study on the implementation of policy formulation in the musrenbang in the poor district bappeda in the implementation process have been carried out well, directed, integrated and responsive to change, in accordance with what is already in the regent's vision and RPJM. However, this is also related to the supporting and inhibiting factors in the implementation process so far including among others citizen participation and the budget which are often the maximum constraints to the implementation of the musrenbang and insufficient budgets are also obstacles to its implementation.
Downloads
References
Dunn, W. (2014). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gajah Mada University Press
Faturahman, B. M. (2017). Pemetaan Potensi Wilayah untuk Menunjang Kebijakan Pangan Kabupaten Pacitan. JISPO, 7(2), 43–62.
Ismail. (2014). Manajamen Peerubahan. Jakarta, Gramedia.
Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri No.050-187/Kep/Bangda/2007 tentang Pedoman Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Penyelenggaraan Musyawarah Perencanaan Pembangunan (Musrenbang)
Narimawati, U. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Bandung, Agung Media.
Nugroho D, R. (2004). Kebijakan Publik, Formulasi, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi. .Jakarta, Gramedia
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Putra, A. E., Mindarti, L. I., & Faturahman, B. M. (2018). Policy Implementation of City Park Utilization in Malang City. MADANI Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 10(2), 30–49.
Sadana, A., S. (2014). Perencanaan Kawasan Permukiman. Yogyakarta, Graha Ilmu.
Sedarmayanti. (2014). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Jakarta, Mandar Maju Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. Bandung:, Alfabeta.
Sholikin, A. (2018). The Future Of Decentralization Politics In Indonesia. MADANI Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 10(3), 1–13.
Sutopo, H., B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta, Sebelas Maret University Press
Widodo, J. (2001). Good governance: Telaah dari Dimensi Akuntabilitas dan Kontrol Birokrasi Pada Era Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah. Surabaya, Insan Cendikia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
