# ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH ALJABAR

• Junaidah Wildani Prodi Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Qomaruddin Gresik
Keywords: algebra problem, Newman’s error analysis, problem solving

### Abstract

This research aimed to analyse students’ error in solving algebra problem. With the research questions are: 1) Among four types of algebraic problem, in which problem students make error the most? 2) How is students’ error characteristics based on the type of algebraic problem? And 3) What type of error students make the most when solving algebraic problem?The subject of this research is 24 students from grade VIII A MTs Ma’arif Assa’adah 2 Sampurnan-Bungah-Gresik. Students were asked to solve algebra problems which consist of four problems. Each problem represents each type of algebra problem. Students’ work then analysed using Newman’s error analysis which classified error into five types; reading, comprehension, transformation, processing skill, and encoding. In this research the ‘reading’ category was left out. The result shows that among four types of algebra problem, students made error the most when solving the problem of algebra as the use of mathematical models to represent and understand quantitative relation. On the problem of algebra as representation and analysis of mathematical situation and structure using algebraic symbol, the most common error located in transformation. This error was also dominant in the problem of algebra as understanding pattern, relation, and function. As for algebra problems as the use of mathematical models to represent and understand quantitative relation, the dominant error located in comprehension. Having said that, transformation and comprehension is the type of error that happened the most.

### References

 Blair, L. 2003. It's Elementary: Introducing Algebraic Thinking Before High School. SEDL Letter. 15(1) : 16-20.
 Clarkson, P. C. 1991. Language Comprehension Errors: A Further Investigation. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 3(2) : 24-33.
 Clements, M. A. 1980. Analyzing Children’s Errors on Written Mathematical Task. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 11(1) : 1-21.
 Institute of Mathematics and Application. __. Ten Reasons for Studying Algebra. Laman diakses dihttp://www.mathscareers.org.uk/article/10-reasons-for-studying-algebra/.
 Jupri, Al dkk. 2014. Difficulties in Initial Algebra Learning in Indonesia. Math Education Research Journal. 4 (26) : 683-710.
 Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. 2004. Algebra: A World of Difference. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.),The Future of The Teaching and Learning of Algebra: The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 329–346). Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.inc. Reston
Virginia.
 Newman, M. A. 1977. An Analysis of Sixth-Grade Pupils’ Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin. 39 : 31-43.
 Newman, M. A. 1983. Strategies for Diagnosis and Remediation. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Sydney.
 Wijaya, Ariadi dkk. 2014. Difficulties in Solving Context-Based PISA Mathematics Task: An Analysis of Students’ Errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast. 11(3) : 555-584.
Published
2018-06-01
Section
Articles