An Interactive Domino Card in Teaching Past Tense
Abstract
The aim of this study was to know the significance and the effectiveness of Domino Card in Teaching Past Tense in students' grammar skills. The study was conducted in SMK Pariwisata Puspa Wisata PGRI Serpong. XII APH 2 was a sample of class which consists of 30 students. The method of this study used a quantitative method with a pre-experimental research design. Pre-test and post-test were used to collect the data. The result of the total students’ pre-test scores is 1590 with an average score of 53, meanwhile, the post-test scores are 2400 with an average of 80. The calculation results of pre-test and post-test used t-test and indicated that the t-count was 14,1 with t-table was 1,71 at the 0,05 significance level. So, this indicates that the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected. This means that using Domino Card in Teaching Past Tense is effective.
Keywords: Domino Card, Teaching Past Tense, method, grammar
Downloads
References
Benitez-correa, Carmen, Paul Gonzalez-torres, and Cesar Ochoa-cueva. “A Comparison between Deductive and Inductive Approaches for Teaching EFL Grammar to High School Students EFL Grammar to High School Students.” International Journal of Instruction 12, no. 1 (2019): 225–236.
Dalil, Zakaria. “The Importance of Grammar in Second Language Teaching,” 2013.
Goertzen, Melissa J. Applying Quantitative Methods to Research and Data. Library Technology Reports. Vol. 53, 2017. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/6325.
Hajji, Kamal Ait, and Youngkeun Kim. “Teaching and Learning Grammar by Games In EFL Classrooms in Moroccan High Schools.” International Journal of English and Education 8, no. 1 (2019): 330–342.
Hall, Cedric, and Stephen Marshall. A Guide for Developing Multiple Choice and Other Objective Style Questions. New Zealand: Centre for Academic Development, 2013.
Harmer, Jeremy. Teaching and Learning Grammar. First. New York: LONGMAN, 1987.
Hashim, Harwati. “Improving ESL Learners’ Grammar with Gamified-Learning.” Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), no. 5 (2019): 41–50.
Nufus, Tatu Zakiyatun. “Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia (Pros and Cons).” English Language in Focus 1, no. 1 (2018): 65–70.
Saputra, Hikmah Noerqori, and Muhamad Sofian Hadi. “Teaching Vocabulary through Fly Swatter Game.” English Language in Focus 2, no. 1 (2019): 17–24.
Savage, K. Lynn, Gretchen Bitterlin, and Dona Price. Grammar Matters Teaching Grammar in Adult ESL Programs. First. New York: Cambridge Univeristy Press, 2010.
Sukrisna, I Made. “Skripsi-Improving-Vocabulary-Mastery-Through-Linking-Words-Game.” Mahasarawati Denpasar Univeristy, 2013.
Tengku Paris, Tengku Nazatul Shima, and Rahmah Lob Yussof. “Enhancing Grammar Using Board Game.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 68, no. December (2012): 213–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.221.
Wishon, G.E., & Burks, J.M. LET’S WRITE ENGLISH. Revised. Van Nostrand Reinhold Ltd, 1999.
Wulandari, Eka. “PROMOTING FUN LEARNING IN WRITING THROUGH GAMES.” Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture 1, no. 2 (2016): 143–157.
Yaccob, N.S. & Yunus, M.M. “Language Games in Teaching and Learning English Grammar: A Literature Review.” Arab World English Journal 10, no. 1 (2019): 209–217.
Yee, Kevin. Interactive Techniques. Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval, 2019.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.