Otonomi Daerah dan Negara Federasi

  • ali zavi
  • reny yulianti
Keywords: local autonomy, decentralization, democration, federal state

Abstract

Option to apply the idea of ​​autonomy as broad as possible, autonomy special, and federation alike can be expected to answer a wide range the problems facing the Indonesian nation as it is today. But which option the best should be seen in the context of the nation's needs we are today. Therefore, let us not be absolute and moreover threatening each other as if a republican boat would break if the unitary state transformed into a federation or if defended furiously as a country unity. Let these choices be widely understood, new then people are ready to set a rational choice. In view authors of both the Unitary State and the Federated States both contain strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, the first must get attention is about the guarantee of justice that can grow and flourish in in one of the two forms of the state, and the second is a matter guarantee national integration to address the national disintegration symptoms broke out lately.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Rozali. Pelaksanaan Otonomi Luas dan Isu Federalisme Sebagai Suatu
Alternatif. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengaturan Pemikiran Undang-Undang Dasar Negara
Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: The Habibie Center, 2001.
Barendt, Eric. An Introducion to Constitutional Law. New York : Oxford
University Press, 1998.
Basri, Faisal H. Tantangan dan Peluang Otonomi Daerah, dalam: Indra J. Pilliang
dkk. (eds.), Otonomi Daerah: Evaluasi dan Proyeksi, Divisi Kajian
Demokrasi Lokal Yayasan Harkat Bangsa, 2003.
Bennett, Walter Hartwell. American Theories of Federalism. Alabama :
University of Alabama Press, 1964.
Budisetyowati, Dwi Andayani. Keberadaan Otonomi Daerah di Negara Kesatuan
Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Disertasi Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum
Universitas Indonesia, 2004.
Daniel J. Elazar, Op.Cit., hlm. 40. Lihat juga: Jutta Kramer, Introduction, dalam:
Federalism and Civil Societies (An International Symposium), Jutta Kramer
dan Hans-Peter Schneider (eds.), Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden,
1999
Diamond, Larry. “How is Indonesia’s democracy doing?”, East Asia Forum,
October 26th, 2009, diunduh dari http://www.eastasiaforum.org/.
Elazar, Daniel Judah. Exploring Federalism. Alabama: The University Alabama
Press Tuscaloosa, 1987.
Fadjar, Mukthie. Reformasi Konstitusi dalam Masa Transisi Paradigmatik.
Malang: In-Trans, 2003.
Goodin, Robert E. “Democracy, Preferences and Paternalism,” Policy Sciences,
Vol. 26, No. 3, Democracy and the Policy Sciences (Aug., 1993).
Inglehart, Ronald and Christian Welzel. “Political Culture and Democracy:
Analyzing Cross-Level Linkages,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 36, No. 1
(Oct., 2003).
Kaho, Josef Riwu. Prospek otonomi daerah di Negara Republik Indonesia.
Yogyakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1988.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, 20th Century Legal Philosophy
Series: Vol. I, Translated by Anders Wedberg, Russell & Russell, New
York, 1973.
Knight, Maurice. Desentralisasi Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir di Amerika Serikat:
Contoh bagi Indonesia. Program Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam (NRM)
USAID-BAPPENAS dan USAIDCRC/ URI, Coastal Resources Center,
University of Rhode Island, Narrgansett, Rhode Island, USA, 2001.
Linz, Juan José and Alfred C. Stepan. Problems of Democratic Transition and
Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist
Europe. John Hopkins University Press, 1996.
Livingston, Wiliams S. Federalism and Constitutional Change. Oxford: The
Clarendon Press, 1956.
Manan, Bagir. Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi
Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2005.
Prasojo, Eko. Federalisme dan Negara Federal – Sebuah Pengantar. Depok :
Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Prihatmoko, Joko J. Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Langsung: Filosofi, Sistem dan
Problema Penerapan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar,
2005.
Rasyid, Ryaas. Indonesia Mengarah Federalisme. Media Indonesia, 22 Agustus
2005.
Saraswati, A., & Sholikin, A. (n.d.). Reposisi CSR (Corporate Social
Responsibility) di Indonesia.
Sholikin, A. (2013). Pemikiran Politik Negara Dan Agama “Ahmad Syafii
Maarif.” UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA.
Sholikin, A. (2018a). Gerakan Politik Islam di Indonesia Pasca Aksi Bela Islam
Jilid I, II dan III. MADANI Journal of Social and Political Science, 10(1),
12–33.
Sholikin, A. (2018b). PERBEDAAN SIKAP POLITIK ELEKTORAL
MUHAMMADIYAH ANTARA PUSAT DAN DAERAH. POLINTER, 3(2).
SHOLIKIN, A., & Abdul Gaffar Karim, M. A. (2015). DEVIASI SIKAP
POLITIK ELEKTORAL MUHAMMADIYAH ANTARA PUSAT DAN
DAERAH (Studi Kasus Sikap Politik Elite Muhammadiyah pada Pilihan
Presiden 2014 dan Pilkada 2010 di Sleman dan Maros). Universitas Gadjah
Mada.
Solikhin, A. (2016). ISLAM, NEGARA, DAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK-HAK
ISLAM MINORITAS. Journal of Governance, 1(1).
Solikhin, A. (2017). Menimbang Pentingnya Desentralisasi Partai Politik di
Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 2(1).
Strong, C.F. Modern Political Constitutions: An Introduction to The Comparative
Study of Their History and Existing Form. London : Sidgwick & Jackson
Limited, 1952.
Sulistiyanto, Priyambudi, Maribeth Erb, (eds). Deepening Democracy In
Indonesia?: Direct Elections For Local Leaders (Pilkada). Institute of
Southeast Asian Studies, 2009.
Thahir, Andi Samad. Otonomi Daerah, Pemilu, dan Pembangunan Politik
Bangsa, Editor: M. Sarief Arief dan A. Toha Almansur, Jakarta: Pusat
Pengkajian Etika Politik dan Pemerintahan, 2002.
Warren, Mark E. “Deliberative Democracy and Authority,” The American
Political Science Review, Vol. 90, No. 1 (Mar., 1996).
Published
2018-02-14
How to Cite
zavi, ali, & yulianti, reny. (2018). Otonomi Daerah dan Negara Federasi. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v10i1.939