Birokrasi Weberian: “Proportional Approach”

  • Midkholus Surur Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan
Keywords: Bureaucracy, Weberian, Political Science, Government

Abstract

Weberian bureaucracy theory is a bureaucratic theory that is very influential on all
countries both those who embrace democracy and authoritarianism. Weber sees that
bureaucratic performance can be approached from social behavior theory. To know and
explain human behavior, it must first know the intent and purpose of the behavior. Weber
distinguishes the motives behind human behavior, namely affective, traditional, value rational
and instrumentally rational. Instrumentally rational is the guideline in the behavior of
Weber's bureaucracy. Weber further stated, authority is not formed and implemented by
itself. In order to create a legal authority there are five creeds that must be used as guidelines.
The five creeds are as follows: Legitimate rules, law is an abstract, impersonal system of rules,
which obeys the law only as members of the bureaucracy, obedience not to the person holding
authority but to the impersonal rule of law. Based on the five conceptions, Weber formulated
eight propositions regarding the formulation of legal authority namely: official duty
regulation, task specialization, hierarchical, technical-legal, impersonal, written,
administrative-bureaucratic staff. This theory is considered by many political experts and
governments to have a number of weaknesses. These weaknesses are a hierarchical
bureaucratic structure, a military-like organizational system, excessive emphasis on the legalformal

aspect, unit specialization, bureaucratic employees who are not neutral and
bureaucratic employees who are less representative. Besides these weaknesses, Weber's
bureaucratic theory has made a positive contribution in the process of implementing
governance today, namely the impersonal system, the contract system for employees, the
career system and the focus on one position.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albrow, Martin. 1996. Birokrasi. Tiara Wacana. Jakarta.
Andreski, Stanilav. 1996. Max Weber:Kapitalisme, Birokrasi dan Agama. PT Tiara Wacana. Yogyakarta.
Adham Putro, Aur. 2000. Bahaya Politisasi Birokrasi. Bernas Tunggal 24 Maret 2000.
Budi, Setiyono. 2004. Birokrasi dalam Prespektif Politik dan Administrasi. Puskodak Undip. Semarang.
Hariandja, Denni BC. 1999. Birokrasi Nan Pongah, Belajar dari Kegagalan Orde Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan
Vol 11 No 2 (2019) : Agustus 2019 Baru. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Kuntowijoyo. 1994. Demokrasi dan Budaya Birokrasi. Yayasan Bintang Jaya. Yogyakarta.
Sholikin, A. (2018a). Islamic Political Movement in Indonesia After “Aksi Bela Islam Jilid I, II and III. Madani
Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 12–33.
Sholikin, A. (2018b). The Future Of Decentralization Politics In Indonesia. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 10(3), 1–13.
Thoha, Miftah. 1991. Beberapa Kebijakan Birokrasi. Media Widya Mandala. Yogyakarta.
Published
2019-08-20
How to Cite
Surur, M. (2019). Birokrasi Weberian: “Proportional Approach”. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 11(2), 86-104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v11i2.1601
Section
Articles